CWE-428: Unquoted Search Path or Element
Abstraction | Structure | Status |
---|---|---|
None | Simple | Draft |
Description
The product uses a search path that contains an unquoted element, in which the element contains whitespace or other separators. This can cause the product to access resources in a parent path.
Extended Description
If a malicious individual has access to the file system, it is possible to elevate privileges by inserting such a file as “C:\Program.exe” to be run by a privileged program making use of WinExec.
Related Weaknesses
Nature | ID | View ID | Name |
---|---|---|---|
ChildOf | CWE-668 | 1000 | Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere |
ChildOf | CWE-668 | 1003 | Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere |
Modes of Introduction
Phase | Note |
---|---|
Implementation | - |
Applicable Platforms
Languages
Class: Not Language-Specific
Technologies
Common Consequences
Scope | Impact | Note |
---|---|---|
Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability | Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands |
Potential Mitigations
Implementation
Properly quote the full search path before executing a program on the system.
Implementation
Strategy: Input Validation
Assume all input is malicious. Use an “accept known good” input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, “boat” may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as “red” or “blue.”
Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code’s environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
Implementation
Strategy: Input Validation
Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application’s current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist validation schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked.
Observed Examples
- CVE-2005-1185: Small handful of others. Program doesn’t quote the “C:\Program Files" path when calling a program to be executed - or any other path with a directory or file whose name contains a space - so attacker can put a malicious program.exe into C:.
- CVE-2005-2938: CreateProcess() and CreateProcessAsUser() can be misused by applications to allow “program.exe” style attacks in C:
- CVE-2000-1128: Applies to “Common Files” folder, with a malicious common.exe, instead of “Program Files”/program.exe.